Skip navigation

Adult Small Volume Nebulizer Evaluation

Name(Required)







Equipment and Patient Preparation

Patient Evaluation

Implementation of Procedure

Follow-up

Demonstrates Knowledge of Fundamental Concepts

Clinical Competency Performance Criteria

Summary Performance Evaluation

Please use the following criteria and select the appropriate pop-up menu.
Satisfactory - ready for clinical application with minimal supervision. Performed procedure accurately, or was able to correct performance without injury to the patient or decreasing effect of therapy being given.
Unsatisfactory performance - not ready for clinical application. Requires remediation under one of the following categories
Minor - Unsatisfactory: Needs to review fundamental concepts or requires re-evaluation of minor deficiency(s) (ex. forgets to wash hands during the Follow-up stage. Must be re-evaluated on this step not the whole procedure).
Major - Unsatisfactory: Requires additional supervised clinical practice and complete re-evaluation of the procedure

References

1. AARC Clinical Practice Guideline: "Selection of Aerosol Delivery Device" RC 1992;37: p891-897
2. AARC Clinical Practice Guideline: "Delivery of Aerosols to the Upper Airway" RC 1994;39(8): p803-807
3. AARC Clinical Practice Guideline: "Assessing Response to Bronchodilator Therapy at Point of Care" RC 1995;40(12):1300-1307
4. CDC, Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings. MMWR Oct. 25, 2002; vol. 51(No. RR-16)
5. Mahler, D; Weinberg D, Wells C, and Feinstein A. The measurement of dyspnea: contents, interobserver agreement and physiologic correlates of two new clinical indexes. Chest 1984; 85:751-758
6. Scanlan CL, Spearman CB, Sheldon RL: "Egan's Fundamentals of Respiratory Care" Mosby 7th, 1999 p696, 684
7. Kacmarek RM, Hess D. "The interface between patient and aerosol generator." Respir Care 1991;36:952-976